Articles Menu
How they would engage and what they would propose is contained in a position paper posted on the IBEW website, and drafted by the IBEW, UMWA, and five other unions in the electric utility, construction, and rail transport sectors. The position paper, Preliminary Labor Positions on Climate Legislation , states their opposition to carbon tax legislation and grave concerns about the Green New Deal . It calls for comprehensive, economy wide climate legislation which would include an national emissions trading scheme, to be introduced no earlier than 10 years after enacting legislation, to allow for development of Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (CCUS) technologies. It also calls for worker transition protections, including compensation and retraining. The policy document was submitted to the House of Representatives Energy and Commerce Committee for the record of their February 6th meeting: “Time for Action: Addressing the Economic and Environmental Effects of Climate Change“.
Reaction: The Washington Post reported: “AFL-CIO criticizes Green New Deal, calling it ‘not achievable or realistic’” (March 12) and in a follow-up piece , “Labor opposition to Green New Deal could be a big obstacle” ( March 14). The United Mine Workers re-posted the Washington Post article . Friends of the Earth, in its reaction to the March 8 letter, states “one-fifth of the unions that make up the AFL-CIO energy committee commented on the Green New Deal”, and, “With the energy committee’s position, the AFL joins climate deniers like the Koch brothers, the Republican Party and Big Oil. We encourage the AFL and other unions within it to rethink this position.”